Choosing Automations That Pay Back
A simple method to prioritise high-impact automation projects.

Emma Johnson
Mar 20, 2025
Automation



Pick Winners With a Transparent Score
Not every task deserves automation. The best candidates happen often, are expensive when delayed, and have a single business metric that can move. A transparent scoring model aligns finance, ops, and product around impact rather than novelty.
Score each candidate (1–5):
Frequency and manual time cost.
Variability and decision complexity.
Integration effort and data readiness.
Clarity of the success metric (e.g., response time < 5 minutes).
Prove value, then scale:
Define the target before building; instrument for automatic measurement.
Ship a production pilot with logging, rate limits, retries, and safe fallback.
Publish the same weekly snapshot: baseline, current value, issues fixed.
Kill ideas that don’t move the metric; double down on those that do.
Turn pilots into standards:
Remove manual checkpoints; document ownership and SLAs.
Expand integrations or channels one at a time.
Capture playbooks so teams can run and recover without specialists.
Budget by portfolio ROI, not isolated anecdotes.
Subscribe
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on features and releases.
Choosing Automations That Pay Back
A simple method to prioritise high-impact automation projects.

Emma Johnson
Mar 20, 2025
Automation



Pick Winners With a Transparent Score
Not every task deserves automation. The best candidates happen often, are expensive when delayed, and have a single business metric that can move. A transparent scoring model aligns finance, ops, and product around impact rather than novelty.
Score each candidate (1–5):
Frequency and manual time cost.
Variability and decision complexity.
Integration effort and data readiness.
Clarity of the success metric (e.g., response time < 5 minutes).
Prove value, then scale:
Define the target before building; instrument for automatic measurement.
Ship a production pilot with logging, rate limits, retries, and safe fallback.
Publish the same weekly snapshot: baseline, current value, issues fixed.
Kill ideas that don’t move the metric; double down on those that do.
Turn pilots into standards:
Remove manual checkpoints; document ownership and SLAs.
Expand integrations or channels one at a time.
Capture playbooks so teams can run and recover without specialists.
Budget by portfolio ROI, not isolated anecdotes.
Subscribe
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on features and releases.
Choosing Automations That Pay Back
A simple method to prioritise high-impact automation projects.

Emma Johnson
Mar 20, 2025
Automation



Pick Winners With a Transparent Score
Not every task deserves automation. The best candidates happen often, are expensive when delayed, and have a single business metric that can move. A transparent scoring model aligns finance, ops, and product around impact rather than novelty.
Score each candidate (1–5):
Frequency and manual time cost.
Variability and decision complexity.
Integration effort and data readiness.
Clarity of the success metric (e.g., response time < 5 minutes).
Prove value, then scale:
Define the target before building; instrument for automatic measurement.
Ship a production pilot with logging, rate limits, retries, and safe fallback.
Publish the same weekly snapshot: baseline, current value, issues fixed.
Kill ideas that don’t move the metric; double down on those that do.
Turn pilots into standards:
Remove manual checkpoints; document ownership and SLAs.
Expand integrations or channels one at a time.
Capture playbooks so teams can run and recover without specialists.
Budget by portfolio ROI, not isolated anecdotes.
Subscribe
Join our newsletter to stay up to date on features and releases.